On 3/4/25 15:38, Tomas Vondra wrote: > > ... > >>> >>> Attached is a patch doing this, but considering it has nothing to do >>> with the shmem sizing, I wonder if it's worth it. >> >> Yes. >> > > OK, barring objections I'll push the v2. >
Pushed, with the tweaks to use FastPathLockSlotsPerBackend() in a couple more places. I noticed sifaka started failing right after I pushed this: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=sifaka&br=master But I have no idea why would this cosmetic change cause issues with LDAP tests, so I'm assuming the failure is unrelated, and the timing is accidental and not caused by the patch. regards -- Tomas Vondra
