On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 3:44 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 02:13:23PM +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote: > > On 2025-Feb-28, Michael Paquier wrote: > >> Saying that, I have also done similar tests with your v12 for a couple > >> of hours and this looks stable under installcheck-world. I can see > >> that you've reworked quite a bit the surroundings of InitializedFrom > >> in this one. If you apply that once again at some point, the > >> buildfarm will be judge in the long-term, but I am rather confident by > >> saying that the situation looks better here, at least. > > > > Heh, no amount of testing can prove lack of bugs; but for sure "it looks > > different now, so it must be correct" must be the weakest proof of > > correctness I've heard of! > > Err, okay. I did use the word "stable" with tests rather than > "correct", and I implied upthread that I did not check the correctness > nor the internals of the patch. If my words held the meaning you > are implying, well, my apologies for the confusion, I guess. I only > tested the patch and it was stable while I've noticed a few diffs with > the previous version, but I did *not* check its internals at all, nor > do I mean that I endorse its logic. I hope that's clear now.
Got it. Michael, thank you very much for your help. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov Supabase
