On Sat, Mar 1, 2025 at 6:37 AM Jacob Champion <jacob.champ...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Should we maybe consider just doing that across the board, and put up > with the inefficiency? Admittedly 1ms is a lot more dead time than > 1ns...
Last time I checked, NetBSD is still using scheduler ticks (100hz periodic interrupt) for all this kind of stuff so it's even worse than that :-) > I prefer your patch, personally. Cool, I'll commit it shortly unless someone else comes up with a better idea.
