On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 15:09, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote:
> One thing I am wondering is whether extensions should be required to > prefix their EXPLAIN option with the extension name to avoid > collisions. > > If two extensions happen to choose the same name, it won't be possible > to use both simultaneously. Could the call that processes the registration automatically prepend the extension name to the supplied explain option name? So if extension X registers option O it would be registered as X_O rather than returning an error if O doesn't follow the proper pattern.
