Dear Amit, > I understand that we may not have a clear use case for this to work in > single-user mode. But how will we define the boundary in similar > cases? I mean, we should have some rule for such exposed functions, > and it should be followed uniformly. Now, if one needs a bigger or > complex change to make the function work in single-user mode, then it > is easy to take an exception from what is currently being followed in > the code. However, if the change is as trivial as you proposed in the > first email, why not go with that and make this function work in > single-user mode?
Hmm, the opinion about this is completely opposite with other reviewers. I want to ask them again how you feel. I also added Tom who pointed out in the initial thread. Question: how you feel to restrict SQL functions for slot during the single-user mode? Nobody has considered use cases for it; we do not have concrete theory and similar cases. And needed band-aid to work seems very small. Best regards, Hayato Kuroda FUJITSU LIMITED
