Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > But let's not make the mistake of saying "we're not going to move > things automatically because we want to find out if the authors are > still interested" and then getting really concerned when some stuff > doesn't get moved. That's missing the whole point.
+1. Having a significant fraction of patches drop off the radar
was the desired outcome, wasn't it?
regards, tom lane
