On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 1:30 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: > procnumber.h seems like the right place, at least without a separate > discussion of the ramifications of making it configurable, no? (I > thought there were ideas about squeezing it down to 16 bits so you > could jam two of 'em into an atomic uint32_t for list headers or > something like that, off-topic here except to say that it seems to > conflict with the idea of making it user-increasable?)
(Please ignore this comment, I'll comment on the other thread instead. Sorry I hadn't seen your patches over there yet: when I started talking about the definition and assertions around MAX_BACKENDS in here, it had jumped out at me independently while trying to answer your question about compile-time log10 stuff, because I also noticed that we sucked even at codifying the log2 constraints.)
