On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:42 PM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> Another alternative, which I think might make more sense, is to make >> use pd->key and pd->partdesc in preference to pd->reldesc->rd_partkey >> and pd->reldesc->rd_partdesc. It seems to me that the idea of the >> PartitionDispatch structure is that it gathers together all of the >> information that we need for tuple routing, so it might make sense for >> the tuple routing code ought to get the information from there rather >> than referring back to the RelationDesc. See attached >> pd-partdesc-use.patch. > > +1 to pd-partdesc-use.patch.
OK, that makes 2 votes for that alternative and 0 for everything else combined, so I've committed that version. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
