Hi, > > On Feb 19, 2025, at 10:02 AM, Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> wrote: > > The opposite, which was discussed at length at FOSDEM, was to ask authors to > > click a single button once a month at most. If that level of engagement is > > too > > much to ask then maybe said authors should question why they in return ask > > others to spend hours reviewing? > > Exactly this.
True, but didn't we just discover that it doesn't work? """ There's a bunch that are still not moved, that I know should be moved. [...] """ I agree about the fact that "no interest" status might be a bit too judgmental. There might be interest but no time. Perhaps something like "no activity" or "closed due to inactivity" would be more appropriate / neutral. We should also emphasise in the emails that the author is free to reopen the entry if he/she believes it was closed by mistake. I also agree that we should account for feature freezes. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
