On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 11:34 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I agree with the proposed patch and this behavior. It is on the lines > of what Tom proposed as one of the ways to address the issue raised in > his initial email. Also, it follows the existing behavior in cases > like view<->function dependency as shown by you in this email, and to > some extent subscription<->publication dependency as shown in email > [1]. > > Let's wait till the beginning of the next CF to see if there are other > suggestions or any arguments against this proposed change. >
I am planning to push Vignesh's proposed patch in the email (1) in a day or two unless there are objections or any other comments on the patch. (1) - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm1TQqBC5ZP5BsNf2LKVu1kEJNJn2spFwbAtyLn1FoAFGQ%40mail.gmail.com -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
