On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 10:08 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Ajin. > > FYI - Patch set v13* no longer applies cleanly. Needs rebasing. > I've rebased the patch. I've also merged patch 1 into patch 2 as the functionality of the changes in patch 1 are only n patch 2.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 10:08 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Ajin. > > FYI - Patch set v13* no longer applies cleanly. Needs rebasing. > I've rebased the patch. I've also merged patch 1 into patch 2 as the functionality of the changes in patch 1 are only in patch 2. So only 2 patches in this version. On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 6:18 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Again, can you share the link of performance data for this overhead > and if you have not published then please share it and also mention it > in commit message? I will run the performance tests and post an update with the results. > Can we try different thresholds for this like 10, 50, 100, 200, etc. > to decide what is a good threshold value to skip filtering changes? > Ok, will do this. For this patch, I reset the count to 0, else the test case fails as filtering could be skipped due to throttling. I think we need a way for the user to set this threshold via a GUC and that can be used for testing. regards, Ajin Cherian Fujitsu Australia
v14-0001-Filter-transactions-that-need-not-be-published.patch
Description: Binary data
v14-0002-Introduce-a-output-plugin-callback-to-filter-cha.patch
Description: Binary data
