Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes:
> From the slow proxy's perspective, it can't rule out the program under test
> having done those two write() calls. The proxy doesn't have enough
> information to reconstruct the original four write() calls. What prevents
> that anomaly?
Yeah, I think it's hopeless to expect that we can disambiguate the
order of writes to two different pipes. For the problem at hand,
though, it seems like we don't really need to do that. Rather, the
question is "when we detect that the program-under-test has exited,
can we be sure we have collected all of its output?". I think that
IPC::Run may be screwing up here, because I have seen non-Windows
CI failures that look like it didn't read all the stderr output.
For example, this pgbench test failure on macOS from [1]:
# Running: pgbench -n -t 1 -Dfoo=bla -Dnull=null -Dtrue=true -Done=1 -Dzero=0.0
-Dbadtrue=trueXXX -Dmaxint=9223372036854775807 -Dminint=-9223372036854775808 -M
prepared -f
/Users/admin/pgsql/build/testrun/pgbench/001_pgbench_with_server/data/t_001_pgbench_with_server_main_data/001_pgbench_error_shell_bad_command
[17:27:47.408](0.061s) ok 273 - pgbench script error: shell bad command status
(got 2 vs expected 2)
[17:27:47.409](0.000s) ok 274 - pgbench script error: shell bad command stdout
/(?^:processed: 0/1)/
[17:27:47.409](0.000s) not ok 275 - pgbench script error: shell bad command
stderr /(?^:\(shell\) .* meta-command failed)/
[17:27:47.409](0.000s) # Failed test 'pgbench script error: shell bad command
stderr /(?^:\(shell\) .* meta-command failed)/'
# at /Users/admin/pgsql/src/bin/pgbench/t/001_pgbench_with_server.pl line
1466.
# ''
# doesn't match '(?^:\(shell\) .* meta-command failed)'
The program's exited with a failure code as expected, and we saw (some
of?) the expected stdout output, but stderr output is reported to be
empty.
regards, tom lane
[1] https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6221238034497536
