Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2025-02-14 10:06:13 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> None of those arguments apply to the sub-SELECT of a "COPY (query) TO"
>> command, but there's a practical matter of how to get the parameters
>> passed through the COPY to the sub-SELECT without opening Pandora's
>> box for every other kind of utility statement.
> I think there's already precedent - CREATE TABLE AS does accept parameters
> today, and it's a utility command too:
Hmm ... yeah, now that I look, there's more pre-existing plumbing
in ProcessUtility than I remembered. So maybe this wouldn't be too
hard after all.
regards, tom lane
