On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 10:36:48AM +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2025-Feb-14, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > > > Since the merging is a yes/no option (I think there used to be some > > discussions > > about having a threshold or some other fancy modes), maybe you could instead > > differentiate the merged version by have 2 constants rather than this "..." > > or > > something like that? > > Maybe the representation can be "($1 /*, ... */)" so that it's obvious > that the array extends beyond the first element but is still > syntactically valid.
Yeah that works too and it's probably way easier to implement.
