On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 03:47:02PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Hmm.. Agreed, it seems that you are right in the way of taking care > of this inconsistency. That's interesting. I would need to look at > that more closely with a couple of hours head down. It's a bit late > in the week here so that's not going to happen today. Note that we > have a release coming next week and all stable branches should not be > touched, but perhaps somebody will be able to beat me here.
Put my head down for a couple of hours on this one to untangle these bits of states with the old and new transition tables, and your suggestions look right, including the tweaks in 15~HEAD for the flag values to keep the branches a bit more consistent. One thing that itched me a bit was in the test, where I found a bit more useful to have two values in the partitions on top of the value moved to a different partition, making the dump of the old and new transition tables a bit more verbose. A nit from me, in this case (the crash still reproduces with the committed test, of course). Nice investigation from you, thanks! Applied down to v13. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
