On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 2:55 PM Andrei Lepikhov <lepi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13/2/2025 01:40, Tom Lane wrote: > > I was idly speculating yesterday about letting the Ryu code print > > the division result, so that we get a variable number of digits. > > Realistically, that'd probably result in many cases in more digits > > than anybody wants, so it's not a serious proposal. I'm cool with > > the fixed-two-digits approach to start with. > Okay, since no one else voted for the meaningful-numbers approach, I > would say that fixed size is better than nothing. It may cover some of > my practical cases, but unfortunately, not the most problematic ones.
I don't love it either, but I do think it is significantly better than nothing. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
