On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 7:08 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 02:02:10PM -0600, Sami Imseih wrote: > > I am OK with moving away from "jumble" in-lieu of something else, but my > thoughts are we should actually call this process "fingerprint" > I agree fingerprint is the right final word. But "jumble" conveys the *process* better than "fingerprinting". I view it as jumbling produces an object that can be fingerprinted. > For node attributes we can specify "fingerprint_ignore" or > "no_fingerprint". What do you think? > Still should be jumble_ignore. Cheers, Greg -- Crunchy Data - https://www.crunchydata.com Enterprise Postgres Software Products & Tech Support
