On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 8:00 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ======
> src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
>
> 1.
>   XLByteToSeg(RedoRecPtr, _logSegNo, wal_segment_size);
>   KeepLogSeg(recptr, &_logSegNo);
> - if (InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots(RS_INVAL_WAL_REMOVED,
> + if (InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots(RS_INVAL_WAL_REMOVED |
> RS_INVAL_IDLE_TIMEOUT,
>      _logSegNo, InvalidOid,
>      InvalidTransactionId))
>   {
> @@ -7792,7 +7792,7 @@ CreateRestartPoint(int flags)
>   replayPtr = GetXLogReplayRecPtr(&replayTLI);
>   endptr = (receivePtr < replayPtr) ? replayPtr : receivePtr;
>   KeepLogSeg(endptr, &_logSegNo);
> - if (InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots(RS_INVAL_WAL_REMOVED,
> + if (InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots(RS_INVAL_WAL_REMOVED |
> RS_INVAL_IDLE_TIMEOUT,
>      _logSegNo, InvalidOid,
>      InvalidTransactionId))
>
> It seems fundamentally strange to me to assign multiple simultaneous
> causes like this. IMO you can't invalidate something that is invalid
> already. I gues v71 was an attempt to implement Amit's:
>

The idea is to invalidate the slot either due to WAL_REMOVED or
IDLE_TIMEOUT in one go during the checkpoint instead of taking
multiple passes over the slots during the checkpoint. Feel free to
suggest if you can think of a better way to implement it.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.


Reply via email to