On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 11:48 PM Bertrand Drouvot
<bertranddrouvot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 12:08:26PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 2:06 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I've attached the updated patch. The fix needs to be back-patched to
> > > v16 where logical decoding on standby was introduced.
>
> Nice catch and thanks for the patch!
> I also do prefer the current idea (disallow to start if the hot_standby is off
> and there is an existing logical slot).
>
> > Isn't it better to give the new ERROR near the below code?
> > RestoreSlotFromDisk()
> > {
> > ...
> > if (cp.slotdata.database != InvalidOid && wal_level < WAL_LEVEL_LOGICAL)
> > ereport(FATAL,
> > (errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
> > errmsg("logical replication slot \"%s\" exists, but \"wal_level\" <
> > \"logical\"",
> > NameStr(cp.slotdata.name)),
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > If feasible, this will avoid an additional loop over the slots and a
> > new ERROR will be added at the same place as an existing similar
> > ERROR.
>
> Agree.

+1

>
> +  if (SlotIsLogical(s) && !EnableHotStandby)
> +      ereport(FATAL,
> +              (errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
> +               errmsg("hot standby must be enabled for pre-existing logical 
> replication slots")));
>
> On a primary lowering wal_level < logical, we'd get something like:
>
> "
> FATAL:  logical replication slot "logical_slot" exists, but "wal_level" < 
> "logical"
> "
>
> What about being close to it, so something like?
>
> "
> FATAL:  logical replication slot "logical_slot" exists, but "hot_standby" = 
> "off"
> "

Looks good, but I'd like to mention that this is required only on
standbys. So how about the following?

FATAL:  logical replication slot "s" exists on the standby, but
"hot_standby" = "off"
HINT:  Change "hot_standby" to be "on".

I've updated the patch accordingly.

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment: v2-0001-Fix-assertion-when-decoding-XLOG_PARAMETER_CHANGE.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to