Thanks for the review! On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 9:09 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > On 2025-01-29 14:12:52 -0500, Melanie Plageman wrote: > > From 71f32189aad510b73d221fb0478ffd916e5e5dde Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplage...@gmail.com> > > Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 12:23:00 -0500 > > Subject: [PATCH v14] Eagerly scan all-visible pages to amortize aggressive > > vacuum > > > > Amortize the cost of an aggressive vacuum by eagerly scanning some > > all-visible but not all-frozen pages during normal vacuums. > > I think it'd be good to explain the problem this is trying to address a bit > more (i.e. the goal is to avoid the situation which a lot of work is deferred > until an aggressive vacuum, which is then very expensive).
Attached v15 does this. > > Because the goal is to freeze these all-visible pages, all-visible pages > > that are eagerly scanned and set all-frozen in the visibility map are > > counted as successful eager freezes and those not frozen are considered > > failed eager freezes. > > I don't really understand this sentence. "Because the goal is to freeze these > all-visible pages" doesn't really relate with the rest of the sentence. The idea was to motivate why we consider them successes and failures. Anyway, I removed it. > > + <varlistentry id="guc-vacuum-max-eager-freeze-failure-rate" > > xreflabel="vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate"> > > + <term><varname>vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate</varname> > > (<type>floating point</type>) > > + <indexterm> > > + <primary><varname>vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate</varname> > > configuration parameter</primary> > > + </indexterm> > > + </term> > > + <listitem> > > + <para> > > + Specifies the maximum fraction of pages that > > + <command>VACUUM</command> may scan and <emphasis>fail</emphasis> > > to set > > + all-frozen in the visibility map before disabling eager scanning. A > > + value of <literal>0</literal> disables eager scanning altogether. > > The > > + default is <literal>0.03</literal> (3%). > > + </para> > > Fraction of what? So, as Robert said downthread, it is a fraction of pages. I've changed the wording of instance of this description to: "maximum number of pages (as a fraction of total pages in the relation)" However, I will note that this "fraction of pages" wording appears in almost every other comment explaining this. v15 does not change these other occurrences. Do you think I should change them? > > + <para> > > + Note that when eager scanning is enabled, successful page freezes > > + do not count against this limit, although they are internally > > + capped at 20% of the all-visible but not all-frozen pages in the > > + relation. Capping successful page freezes helps amortize the > > + overhead across multiple normal vacuums. > > + </para> > > What does it mean that they are not counted, but are capped? They are not counted toward the failure cap but they are counted towards an internally hard-coded success cap. I took a stab at clarifying this in attached v15. > > + <para> > > + If a table is building up a backlog of all-visible but not all-frozen > > + pages, a normal vacuum may choose to scan skippable pages in an effort > > to > > + freeze them. Doing so decreases the number of pages the next aggressive > > + vacuum must scan. These are referred to as <firstterm>eagerly > > + scanned</firstterm> pages. Eager scanning can be tuned to attempt > > + to freeze more all-visible pages by increasing > > + <xref linkend="guc-vacuum-max-eager-freeze-failure-rate"/>. Even if > > eager > > + scanning has kept the number of all-visible but not all-frozen pages > > to a > > + minimum, most tables still require periodic aggressive vacuuming. > > + </para> > > Maybe mention that the aggressive vacuuming will often be cheaper than without > eager freezing, even if necessary? Done. > > + * Normal vacuums count all-visible pages eagerly scanned as a success when > > + * they are able to set them all-frozen in the VM and as a failure when > > they > > + * are not able to set them all-frozen. > > Maybe some more punctuation would make this more readable? Or a slight > rephrasing? Done. > > + * Because we want to amortize the overhead of freezing pages over multiple > > + * vacuums, normal vacuums cap the number of successful eager freezes to > > + * MAX_EAGER_FREEZE_SUCCESS_RATE of the number of all-visible but not > > + * all-frozen pages at the beginning of the vacuum. Once the success cap > > has > > + * been hit, eager scanning is disabled for the remainder of the vacuum of > > the > > + * relation. > > It also caps the maximum "downside" of freezing eagerly, right? Seems worth > mentioning. Done here and one other place (in docs). > > + /* > > + * Now calculate the eager scan start block. Start at a random spot > > + * somewhere within the first eager scan region. This avoids eager > > + * scanning and failing to freeze the exact same blocks each vacuum > > of the > > + * relation. > > + */ > > If I understand correctly, we're not really choosing a spot inside the first > eager scan region, we determine the bounds of the first region? I'm not sure I understand how those are different, but I updated the comment a bit. Maybe you can elaborate what you mean? > > @@ -930,16 +1188,21 @@ lazy_scan_heap(LVRelState *vacrel) > > vacrel->current_block = InvalidBlockNumber; > > vacrel->next_unskippable_block = InvalidBlockNumber; > > vacrel->next_unskippable_allvis = false; > > + vacrel->next_unskippable_eager_scanned = false; > > vacrel->next_unskippable_vmbuffer = InvalidBuffer; > > > > - while (heap_vac_scan_next_block(vacrel, &blkno, > > &all_visible_according_to_vm)) > > + while (heap_vac_scan_next_block(vacrel, &blkno, > > &all_visible_according_to_vm, > > + > > &was_eager_scanned)) > > Pedantic^3: Is past tense really appropriate? We *will* be scanning that page > in the body of the loop, right? I thought about this. I chose was_eager_scanned because 1) by the time we use it, it has been eager scanned and I thought calling it do_eager_scan might make that less clear and 2) the eager_scanned logging member of LVRelState is incremented before it is actually scanned, so I thought that was already set as a precedent. I haven't changed it in this version, but I am open to renaming it if you think doing so makes it more clear (especially where the variable is used [not set]). What do you suggest? > > @@ -1064,7 +1327,45 @@ lazy_scan_heap(LVRelState *vacrel) > > if (got_cleanup_lock) > > lazy_scan_prune(vacrel, buf, blkno, page, > > vmbuffer, > > all_visible_according_to_vm, > > - &has_lpdead_items); > > + &has_lpdead_items, > > &vm_page_frozen); > > + > > + /* > > + * Count an eagerly scanned page as a failure or a success. > > + */ > > + if (was_eager_scanned) > > Hm - how should pages be counted that we couldn't get a lock on? I think > right now they'll be counted as a failure, but that doesn't seem quite right. Yea, I thought that counting them as failures made sense because we did fail to freeze them. However, now that you mention it, we didn't fail to freeze them because of age, so maybe we don't want to count them as failures. I don't expect us to have a bunch of contended all-visible pages, so I think the question is about what makes it more clear in the code. What do you think? Should I reset was_eager_scanned to false if we don't get the cleanup lock? > > diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c > > b/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c > > index 0ab921a169b..32a1b8c46a1 100644 > > --- a/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c > > +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c > > @@ -2826,6 +2826,12 @@ table_recheck_autovac(Oid relid, HTAB > > *table_toast_map, > > tab->at_params.is_wraparound = wraparound; > > tab->at_params.log_min_duration = log_min_duration; > > tab->at_params.toast_parent = InvalidOid; > > + > > + /* > > + * Later we check reloptions for > > vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate > > + * override > > + */ > > + tab->at_params.max_eager_freeze_failure_rate = > > vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate; > > tab->at_storage_param_vac_cost_limit = avopts ? > > avopts->vacuum_cost_limit : 0; > > tab->at_storage_param_vac_cost_delay = avopts ? > > I'd mention where that is, so that a reader of that comment doesn't have to > search around... Done. - Melanie
From e738725a97dad797eedf264dfa0a58c7375d4de8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplage...@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 12:23:00 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v15] Eagerly scan all-visible pages to amortize aggressive vacuum Aggressive vacuums must scan every unfrozen tuple in order to advance the relfrozenxid/relminmxid. Because data is often vacuumed before it is old enough to require freezing, relations may build up a large backlog of pages that are set all-visible but not all-frozen in the visibility map. When an aggressive vacuum is triggered, all of these pages must be scanned. These pages have often been evicted from shared buffers and even from the kernel buffer cache. Thus, aggressive vacuums often incur large amounts of extra I/O at the expense of foreground workloads. To amortize the cost of aggressive vacuums, eagerly scan some all-visible but not all-frozen pages during normal vacuums. All-visible pages that are eagerly scanned and set all-frozen in the visibility map are counted as successful eager freezes and those not frozen are counted as failed eager freezes. If too many eager scans fail in a row, eager scanning is temporarily suspended until a later portion of the relation. The number of failures tolerated is configurable globally and per table. To effectively amortize aggressive vacuums, we cap the number of successes as well. Once we reach the maximum number of blocks successfully eager frozen, eager scanning is disabled for the remainder of the vacuum of the relation. Original design idea from Robert Haas, with enhancements from Andres Freund, Tomas Vondra, and me Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> Reviewed-by: Robert Treat <r...@xzilla.net> Reviewed-by: Bilal Yavuz <byavu...@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/CAAKRu_ZF_KCzZuOrPrOqjGVe8iRVWEAJSpzMgRQs%3D5-v84cXUg%40mail.gmail.com --- doc/src/sgml/config.sgml | 39 ++ doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml | 33 +- doc/src/sgml/ref/create_table.sgml | 15 + src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c | 14 +- src/backend/access/heap/vacuumlazy.c | 423 ++++++++++++++++-- src/backend/commands/vacuum.c | 15 + src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c | 6 + src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c | 10 + src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample | 1 + src/bin/psql/tab-complete.in.c | 2 + src/include/commands/vacuum.h | 17 + src/include/utils/rel.h | 6 + 12 files changed, 540 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml index a782f109982..38cb34b696e 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml @@ -9117,6 +9117,45 @@ COPY postgres_log FROM '/full/path/to/logfile.csv' WITH csv; </listitem> </varlistentry> + <varlistentry id="guc-vacuum-max-eager-freeze-failure-rate" xreflabel="vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate"> + <term><varname>vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate</varname> (<type>floating point</type>) + <indexterm> + <primary><varname>vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate</varname> configuration parameter</primary> + </indexterm> + </term> + <listitem> + <para> + Specifies the maximum number of pages (as a fraction of total pages in + the relation) that <command>VACUUM</command> may scan and + <emphasis>fail</emphasis> to set all-frozen in the visibility map + before disabling eager scanning. A value of <literal>0</literal> + disables eager scanning altogether. The default is + <literal>0.03</literal> (3%). + </para> + + <para> + Note that when eager scanning is enabled, successful page freezes do + not count against the cap on eager freeze failures. Successful page + freezes are capped internally at 20% of the all-visible but not + all-frozen pages in the relation. Capping successful page freezes helps + amortize the overhead across multiple normal vacuums and limits the + potential downside of wasted eager freezes of pages that are modified + again before the next aggressive vacuum. + </para> + + <para> + This parameter can only be set in the + <filename>postgresql.conf</filename> file or on the server command + line; but the setting can be overridden for individual tables by + changing the + <link linkend="reloption-vacuum-max-eager-freeze-failure-rate"> + corresponding table storage parameter</link>. + For more information on tuning vacuum's freezing behavior, + see <xref linkend="vacuum-for-wraparound"/>. + </para> + </listitem> + </varlistentry> + </variablelist> </sect2> </sect1> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml index 0be90bdc7ef..f57cabbe05d 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml @@ -496,9 +496,25 @@ When that happens, <command>VACUUM</command> will eventually need to perform an <firstterm>aggressive vacuum</firstterm>, which will freeze all eligible unfrozen XID and MXID values, including those from all-visible but not all-frozen pages. - In practice most tables require periodic aggressive vacuuming. + </para> + + <para> + If a table is building up a backlog of all-visible but not all-frozen + pages, a normal vacuum may choose to scan skippable pages in an effort to + freeze them. Doing so decreases the number of pages the next aggressive + vacuum must scan. These are referred to as <firstterm>eagerly + scanned</firstterm> pages. Eager scanning can be tuned to attempt to freeze + more all-visible pages by increasing <xref + linkend="guc-vacuum-max-eager-freeze-failure-rate"/>. Even if eager + scanning has kept the number of all-visible but not all-frozen pages to a + minimum, most tables still require periodic aggressive vacuuming. However, + any pages successfully eager frozen may be skipped during an aggressive + vacuum, so eager freezing may minimize the overhead of aggressive vacuums. + </para> + + <para> <xref linkend="guc-vacuum-freeze-table-age"/> - controls when <command>VACUUM</command> does that: all-visible but not all-frozen + controls when a table is aggressively vacuumed. All all-visible but not all-frozen pages are scanned if the number of transactions that have passed since the last such scan is greater than <varname>vacuum_freeze_table_age</varname> minus <varname>vacuum_freeze_min_age</varname>. Setting @@ -626,10 +642,12 @@ SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database; </tip> <para> - <command>VACUUM</command> normally only scans pages that have been modified - since the last vacuum, but <structfield>relfrozenxid</structfield> can only be - advanced when every page of the table - that might contain unfrozen XIDs is scanned. This happens when + While <command>VACUUM</command> scans mostly pages that have been + modified since the last vacuum, it may also eagerly scan some + all-visible but not all-frozen pages in an attempt to freeze them, but + the <structfield>relfrozenxid</structfield> will only be advanced when + every page of the table that might contain unfrozen XIDs is scanned. + This happens when <structfield>relfrozenxid</structfield> is more than <varname>vacuum_freeze_table_age</varname> transactions old, when <command>VACUUM</command>'s <literal>FREEZE</literal> option is used, or when all @@ -929,8 +947,7 @@ vacuum insert threshold = vacuum base insert threshold + vacuum insert scale fac If the <structfield>relfrozenxid</structfield> value of the table is more than <varname>vacuum_freeze_table_age</varname> transactions old, an aggressive vacuum is performed to freeze old tuples and advance - <structfield>relfrozenxid</structfield>; otherwise, only pages that have been modified - since the last vacuum are scanned. + <structfield>relfrozenxid</structfield>. </para> <para> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_table.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_table.sgml index 2237321cb4f..7e2deeebfad 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_table.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_table.sgml @@ -1931,6 +1931,21 @@ WITH ( MODULUS <replaceable class="parameter">numeric_literal</replaceable>, REM </listitem> </varlistentry> + <varlistentry id="reloption-vacuum-max-eager-freeze-failure-rate" xreflabel="vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate"> + <term><literal>vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate</literal>, <literal>toast.vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate</literal> (<type>floating point</type>) + <indexterm> + <primary><varname>vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate</varname></primary> + <secondary>storage parameter</secondary> + </indexterm> + </term> + <listitem> + <para> + Per-table value for <xref linkend="guc-vacuum-max-eager-freeze-failure-rate"/> + parameter. + </para> + </listitem> + </varlistentry> + <varlistentry id="reloption-user-catalog-table" xreflabel="user_catalog_table"> <term><literal>user_catalog_table</literal> (<type>boolean</type>) <indexterm> diff --git a/src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c b/src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c index e587abd9990..31a8212faf1 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c +++ b/src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c @@ -423,6 +423,16 @@ static relopt_real realRelOpts[] = }, -1, 0.0, 100.0 }, + { + { + "vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate", + "Fraction of pages in a relation vacuum can scan and fail to freeze before disabling eager scanning.", + RELOPT_KIND_HEAP | RELOPT_KIND_TOAST, + ShareUpdateExclusiveLock + }, + -1, 0.0, 1.0 + }, + { { "seq_page_cost", @@ -1880,7 +1890,9 @@ default_reloptions(Datum reloptions, bool validate, relopt_kind kind) {"vacuum_index_cleanup", RELOPT_TYPE_ENUM, offsetof(StdRdOptions, vacuum_index_cleanup)}, {"vacuum_truncate", RELOPT_TYPE_BOOL, - offsetof(StdRdOptions, vacuum_truncate)} + offsetof(StdRdOptions, vacuum_truncate)}, + {"vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate", RELOPT_TYPE_REAL, + offsetof(StdRdOptions, vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate)} }; return (bytea *) build_reloptions(reloptions, validate, kind, diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/vacuumlazy.c b/src/backend/access/heap/vacuumlazy.c index 075af385cd1..4c477b6d254 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/heap/vacuumlazy.c +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/vacuumlazy.c @@ -17,9 +17,9 @@ * failsafe mechanism has triggered (to avoid transaction ID wraparound), * vacuum may skip phases II and III. * - * If the TID store fills up in phase I, vacuum suspends phase I, proceeds to - * phases II and II, cleaning up the dead tuples referenced in the current TID - * store. This empties the TID store resumes phase I. + * If the TID store fills up in phase I, vacuum suspends phase I and proceeds + * to phases II and III, cleaning up the dead tuples referenced in the current + * TID store. This empties the TID store, allowing vacuum to resume phase I. * * In a way, the phases are more like states in a state machine, but they have * been referred to colloquially as phases for so long that they are referred @@ -41,9 +41,53 @@ * to the end, skipping pages as permitted by their visibility status, vacuum * options, and various other requirements. * - * When page skipping is not disabled, a non-aggressive vacuum may scan pages - * that are marked all-visible (and even all-frozen) in the visibility map if - * the range of skippable pages is below SKIP_PAGES_THRESHOLD. + * Vacuums are either aggressive or normal. Aggressive vacuums must scan every + * unfrozen tuple in order to advance relfrozenxid and avoid transaction ID + * wraparound. Normal vacuums may scan otherwise skippable pages for one of + * two reasons: + * + * When page skipping is not disabled, a normal vacuum may scan pages that are + * marked all-visible (and even all-frozen) in the visibility map if the range + * of skippable pages is below SKIP_PAGES_THRESHOLD. This is primarily for the + * benefit of kernel readahead (see comment in heap_vac_scan_next_block()). + * + * A normal vacuum may also scan skippable pages in an effort to freeze them + * and decrease the backlog of all-visible but not all-frozen pages that have + * to be processed by the next aggressive vacuum. These are referred to as + * eagerly scanned pages. Pages scanned due to SKIP_PAGES_THRESHOLD do not + * count as eagerly scanned pages. + * + * Eagerly scanned pages that are set all-frozen in the VM are successful + * eager freezes and those not set all-frozen in the VM are failed eager + * freezes. + * + * Because we want to amortize the overhead of freezing pages over multiple + * vacuums, normal vacuums cap the number of successful eager freezes to + * MAX_EAGER_FREEZE_SUCCESS_RATE of the number of all-visible but not + * all-frozen pages at the beginning of the vacuum. Since eagerly frozen pages + * may be unfrozen before the next aggressive vacuum, capping the number of + * successful eager freezes also caps the downside of eager freezing: + * potentially wasted work. + * + * Once the success cap has been hit, eager scanning is disabled for the + * remainder of the vacuum of the relation. + * + * Success is capped globally because we don't want to limit our successes if + * old data happens to be concentrated in a particular part of the table. This + * is especially likely to happen for append-mostly workloads where the oldest + * data is at the beginning of the unfrozen portion of the relation. + * + * On the assumption that different regions of the table are likely to contain + * similarly aged data, normal vacuums use a localized eager freeze failure + * cap. The failure count is reset for each region of the table -- comprised + * of EAGER_SCAN_REGION_SIZE blocks. In each region, we tolerate + * vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate of EAGER_SCAN_REGION_SIZE failures + * before suspending eager scanning until the end of the region. + * vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate is configurable both globally and per + * table. + * + * Aggressive vacuums must examine every unfrozen tuple and thus are not + * subject to any of the limits imposed by the eager scanning algorithm. * * Once vacuum has decided to scan a given block, it must read the block and * obtain a cleanup lock to prune tuples on the page. A non-aggressive vacuum @@ -100,6 +144,7 @@ #include "commands/progress.h" #include "commands/vacuum.h" #include "common/int.h" +#include "common/pg_prng.h" #include "executor/instrument.h" #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pgstat.h" @@ -185,6 +230,24 @@ typedef enum VACUUM_ERRCB_PHASE_TRUNCATE, } VacErrPhase; +/* + * An eager scan of a page that is set all-frozen in the VM is considered + * "successful". To spread out freezing overhead across multiple normal + * vacuums, we limit the number of successful eager page freezes. The maximum + * number of eager page freezes is calculated as a ratio of the all-visible + * but not all-frozen pages at the beginning of the vacuum. + */ +#define MAX_EAGER_FREEZE_SUCCESS_RATE 0.2 + +/* + * On the assumption that different regions of the table tend to have + * similarly aged data, once vacuum fails to freeze + * vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate of the blocks in a region of size + * EAGER_SCAN_REGION_SIZE, it suspends eager scanning until it has progressed + * to another region of the table with potentially older data. + */ +#define EAGER_SCAN_REGION_SIZE 4096 + typedef struct LVRelState { /* Target heap relation and its indexes */ @@ -241,6 +304,13 @@ typedef struct LVRelState BlockNumber rel_pages; /* total number of pages */ BlockNumber scanned_pages; /* # pages examined (not skipped via VM) */ + + /* + * Count of all-visible blocks eagerly scanned (for logging only). This + * does not include skippable blocks scanned due to SKIP_PAGES_THRESHOLD. + */ + BlockNumber eager_scanned_pages; + BlockNumber removed_pages; /* # pages removed by relation truncation */ BlockNumber new_frozen_tuple_pages; /* # pages with newly frozen tuples */ @@ -282,9 +352,57 @@ typedef struct LVRelState BlockNumber current_block; /* last block returned */ BlockNumber next_unskippable_block; /* next unskippable block */ bool next_unskippable_allvis; /* its visibility status */ + bool next_unskippable_eager_scanned; /* if it was eagerly scanned */ Buffer next_unskippable_vmbuffer; /* buffer containing its VM bit */ + + /* State related to managing eager scanning of all-visible pages */ + + /* + * A normal vacuum that has failed to freeze too many eagerly scanned + * blocks in a region suspends eager scanning. + * next_eager_scan_region_start is the block number of the first block + * eligible for resumed eager scanning. + * + * When eager scanning is permanently disabled, either initially + * (including for aggressive vacuum) or due to hitting the success cap, + * this is set to InvalidBlockNumber. + */ + BlockNumber next_eager_scan_region_start; + + /* + * The remaining number of blocks a normal vacuum will consider eager + * scanning when it is successful. When eager scanning is enabled, this is + * initialized to MAX_EAGER_FREEZE_SUCCESS_RATE of the total number of + * all-visible but not all-frozen pages. For each eager freeze success, + * this is decremented. Once it hits 0, eager scanning is permanently + * disabled. It is initialized to 0 if eager scanning starts out disabled + * (including for aggressive vacuum). + */ + BlockNumber eager_scan_remaining_successes; + + /* + * The maximum number of blocks which may be eagerly scanned and not + * frozen before eager scanning is temporarily suspended. This is + * configurable both globally, via the + * vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate GUC, and per table, with a table + * storage parameter of the same name. It is calculated as + * vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate of EAGER_SCAN_REGION_SIZE blocks. + * It is 0 when eager scanning is disabled. + */ + BlockNumber eager_scan_max_fails_per_region; + + /* + * The number of eagerly scanned blocks vacuum failed to freeze (due to + * age) in the current eager scan region. Vacuum resets it to + * eager_scan_max_fails_per_region each time it enters a new region of the + * relation. If eager_scan_remaining_fails hits 0, eager scanning is + * suspended until the next region. It is also 0 if eager scanning has + * been permanently disabled. + */ + BlockNumber eager_scan_remaining_fails; } LVRelState; + /* Struct for saving and restoring vacuum error information. */ typedef struct LVSavedErrInfo { @@ -296,8 +414,11 @@ typedef struct LVSavedErrInfo /* non-export function prototypes */ static void lazy_scan_heap(LVRelState *vacrel); +static void heap_vacuum_eager_scan_setup(LVRelState *vacrel, + VacuumParams *params); static bool heap_vac_scan_next_block(LVRelState *vacrel, BlockNumber *blkno, - bool *all_visible_according_to_vm); + bool *all_visible_according_to_vm, + bool *was_eager_scanned); static void find_next_unskippable_block(LVRelState *vacrel, bool *skipsallvis); static bool lazy_scan_new_or_empty(LVRelState *vacrel, Buffer buf, BlockNumber blkno, Page page, @@ -305,7 +426,7 @@ static bool lazy_scan_new_or_empty(LVRelState *vacrel, Buffer buf, static void lazy_scan_prune(LVRelState *vacrel, Buffer buf, BlockNumber blkno, Page page, Buffer vmbuffer, bool all_visible_according_to_vm, - bool *has_lpdead_items); + bool *has_lpdead_items, bool *vm_page_frozen); static bool lazy_scan_noprune(LVRelState *vacrel, Buffer buf, BlockNumber blkno, Page page, bool *has_lpdead_items); @@ -347,6 +468,129 @@ static void restore_vacuum_error_info(LVRelState *vacrel, const LVSavedErrInfo *saved_vacrel); + +/* + * Helper to set up the eager scanning state for vacuuming a single relation. + * Initializes the eager scan management related members of the LVRelState. + * + * Caller provides whether or not an aggressive vacuum is required due to + * vacuum options or for relfrozenxid/relminmxid advancement. + */ +static void +heap_vacuum_eager_scan_setup(LVRelState *vacrel, VacuumParams *params) +{ + uint32 randseed; + BlockNumber allvisible; + BlockNumber allfrozen; + float first_region_ratio; + bool oldest_unfrozen_before_cutoff = false; + + /* + * Initialize eager scan management fields to their disabled values. + * Aggressive vacuums, normal vacuums of small tables, and normal vacuums + * of tables without sufficiently old tuples disable eager scanning. + */ + vacrel->next_eager_scan_region_start = InvalidBlockNumber; + vacrel->eager_scan_max_fails_per_region = 0; + vacrel->eager_scan_remaining_fails = 0; + vacrel->eager_scan_remaining_successes = 0; + + /* If eager scanning is explicitly disabled, just return. */ + if (params->max_eager_freeze_failure_rate == 0) + return; + + /* + * The caller will have determined whether or not an aggressive vacuum is + * required by either the vacuum parameters or the relative age of the + * oldest unfrozen transaction IDs. An aggressive vacuum must scan every + * all-visible page to safely advance the relfrozenxid and/or relminmxid, + * so scans of all-visible pages are not considered eager. + */ + if (vacrel->aggressive) + return; + + /* + * Aggressively vacuuming a small relation shouldn't take long, so it + * isn't worth amortizing. We use two times the region size as the size + * cutoff because the eager scan start block is a random spot somewhere in + * the first region, making the second region the first to be eager + * scanned normally. + */ + if (vacrel->rel_pages < 2 * EAGER_SCAN_REGION_SIZE) + return; + + /* + * We only want to enable eager scanning if we are likely to be able to + * freeze some of the pages in the relation. + * + * Tuples with XIDs older than OldestXmin or MXIDs older than OldestMxact + * are technically freezable, but we won't freeze them unless the criteria + * for opportunistic freezing is met. Only tuples with XIDs/MXIDs older + * than the the FreezeLimit/MultiXactCutoff are frozen in the common case. + * + * So, as a heuristic, we wait until the FreezeLimit has advanced past the + * relfrozenxid or the MultiXactCutoff has advanced past the relminmxid to + * enable eager scanning. + */ + if (TransactionIdIsNormal(vacrel->cutoffs.relfrozenxid) && + TransactionIdPrecedes(vacrel->cutoffs.relfrozenxid, + vacrel->cutoffs.FreezeLimit)) + oldest_unfrozen_before_cutoff = true; + + if (!oldest_unfrozen_before_cutoff && + MultiXactIdIsValid(vacrel->cutoffs.relminmxid) && + MultiXactIdPrecedes(vacrel->cutoffs.relminmxid, + vacrel->cutoffs.MultiXactCutoff)) + oldest_unfrozen_before_cutoff = true; + + if (!oldest_unfrozen_before_cutoff) + return; + + /* We have met the criteria to eagerly scan some pages. */ + + /* + * Our success cap is MAX_EAGER_FREEZE_SUCCESS_RATE of the number of + * all-visible but not all-frozen blocks in the relation. + */ + visibilitymap_count(vacrel->rel, &allvisible, &allfrozen); + + vacrel->eager_scan_remaining_successes = + (BlockNumber) (MAX_EAGER_FREEZE_SUCCESS_RATE * + (allvisible - allfrozen)); + + /* If every all-visible page is frozen, eager scanning is disabled. */ + if (vacrel->eager_scan_remaining_successes == 0) + return; + + /* + * Now calculate the bounds of the first eager scan region. The start + * block will be a random spot somewhere within the first eager scan + * region. This avoids eager scanning and failing to freeze the exact same + * blocks each vacuum of the relation. + */ + randseed = pg_prng_uint32(&pg_global_prng_state); + + vacrel->next_eager_scan_region_start = randseed % EAGER_SCAN_REGION_SIZE; + + Assert(params->max_eager_freeze_failure_rate > 0 && + params->max_eager_freeze_failure_rate <= 1); + + vacrel->eager_scan_max_fails_per_region = + params->max_eager_freeze_failure_rate * + EAGER_SCAN_REGION_SIZE; + + /* + * The first region will be smaller than subsequent regions. As such, + * adjust the eager freeze failures tolerated for this region. + */ + first_region_ratio = 1 - (float) vacrel->next_eager_scan_region_start / + EAGER_SCAN_REGION_SIZE; + + vacrel->eager_scan_remaining_fails = + vacrel->eager_scan_max_fails_per_region * + first_region_ratio; +} + /* * heap_vacuum_rel() -- perform VACUUM for one heap relation * @@ -477,6 +721,7 @@ heap_vacuum_rel(Relation rel, VacuumParams *params, /* Initialize page counters explicitly (be tidy) */ vacrel->scanned_pages = 0; + vacrel->eager_scanned_pages = 0; vacrel->removed_pages = 0; vacrel->new_frozen_tuple_pages = 0; vacrel->lpdead_item_pages = 0; @@ -502,6 +747,7 @@ heap_vacuum_rel(Relation rel, VacuumParams *params, vacrel->vm_new_visible_pages = 0; vacrel->vm_new_visible_frozen_pages = 0; vacrel->vm_new_frozen_pages = 0; + vacrel->rel_pages = orig_rel_pages = RelationGetNumberOfBlocks(rel); /* * Get cutoffs that determine which deleted tuples are considered DEAD, @@ -520,11 +766,16 @@ heap_vacuum_rel(Relation rel, VacuumParams *params, * to increase the number of dead tuples it can prune away.) */ vacrel->aggressive = vacuum_get_cutoffs(rel, params, &vacrel->cutoffs); - vacrel->rel_pages = orig_rel_pages = RelationGetNumberOfBlocks(rel); vacrel->vistest = GlobalVisTestFor(rel); /* Initialize state used to track oldest extant XID/MXID */ vacrel->NewRelfrozenXid = vacrel->cutoffs.OldestXmin; vacrel->NewRelminMxid = vacrel->cutoffs.OldestMxact; + + /* + * Initialize state related to tracking all-visible page skipping. This is + * very important to determine whether or not it is safe to advance the + * relfrozenxid/relminmxid. + */ vacrel->skippedallvis = false; skipwithvm = true; if (params->options & VACOPT_DISABLE_PAGE_SKIPPING) @@ -539,6 +790,13 @@ heap_vacuum_rel(Relation rel, VacuumParams *params, vacrel->skipwithvm = skipwithvm; + /* + * Set up eager scan tracking state. This must happen after determining + * whether or not the vacuum must be aggressive, because only normal + * vacuums use the eager scan algorithm. + */ + heap_vacuum_eager_scan_setup(vacrel, params); + if (verbose) { if (vacrel->aggressive) @@ -734,12 +992,14 @@ heap_vacuum_rel(Relation rel, VacuumParams *params, vacrel->relnamespace, vacrel->relname, vacrel->num_index_scans); - appendStringInfo(&buf, _("pages: %u removed, %u remain, %u scanned (%.2f%% of total)\n"), + appendStringInfo(&buf, _("pages: %u removed, %u remain, %u scanned (%.2f%% of total), %u eagerly scanned\n"), vacrel->removed_pages, new_rel_pages, vacrel->scanned_pages, orig_rel_pages == 0 ? 100.0 : - 100.0 * vacrel->scanned_pages / orig_rel_pages); + 100.0 * vacrel->scanned_pages / + orig_rel_pages, + vacrel->eager_scanned_pages); appendStringInfo(&buf, _("tuples: %lld removed, %lld remain, %lld are dead but not yet removable\n"), (long long) vacrel->tuples_deleted, @@ -910,8 +1170,10 @@ lazy_scan_heap(LVRelState *vacrel) BlockNumber rel_pages = vacrel->rel_pages, blkno, next_fsm_block_to_vacuum = 0; - bool all_visible_according_to_vm; - + bool all_visible_according_to_vm, + was_eager_scanned = false; + BlockNumber orig_eager_scan_success_limit = + vacrel->eager_scan_remaining_successes; /* for logging */ Buffer vmbuffer = InvalidBuffer; const int initprog_index[] = { PROGRESS_VACUUM_PHASE, @@ -930,16 +1192,21 @@ lazy_scan_heap(LVRelState *vacrel) vacrel->current_block = InvalidBlockNumber; vacrel->next_unskippable_block = InvalidBlockNumber; vacrel->next_unskippable_allvis = false; + vacrel->next_unskippable_eager_scanned = false; vacrel->next_unskippable_vmbuffer = InvalidBuffer; - while (heap_vac_scan_next_block(vacrel, &blkno, &all_visible_according_to_vm)) + while (heap_vac_scan_next_block(vacrel, &blkno, &all_visible_according_to_vm, + &was_eager_scanned)) { Buffer buf; Page page; bool has_lpdead_items; + bool vm_page_frozen = false; bool got_cleanup_lock = false; vacrel->scanned_pages++; + if (was_eager_scanned) + vacrel->eager_scanned_pages++; /* Report as block scanned, update error traceback information */ pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_VACUUM_HEAP_BLKS_SCANNED, blkno); @@ -1064,7 +1331,45 @@ lazy_scan_heap(LVRelState *vacrel) if (got_cleanup_lock) lazy_scan_prune(vacrel, buf, blkno, page, vmbuffer, all_visible_according_to_vm, - &has_lpdead_items); + &has_lpdead_items, &vm_page_frozen); + + /* + * Count an eagerly scanned page as a failure or a success. + */ + if (was_eager_scanned) + { + /* Aggressive vacuums do not eager scan. */ + Assert(!vacrel->aggressive); + + if (vm_page_frozen) + { + Assert(vacrel->eager_scan_remaining_successes > 0); + vacrel->eager_scan_remaining_successes--; + + if (vacrel->eager_scan_remaining_successes == 0) + { + /* + * If we hit our success cap, permanently disable eager + * scanning by setting the other eager scan management + * fields to their disabled values. + */ + vacrel->eager_scan_remaining_fails = 0; + vacrel->next_eager_scan_region_start = InvalidBlockNumber; + vacrel->eager_scan_max_fails_per_region = 0; + + ereport(vacrel->verbose ? INFO : DEBUG2, + (errmsg("disabling eager scanning after freezing %u eagerly scanned blocks of \"%s.%s.%s\"", + orig_eager_scan_success_limit, + vacrel->dbname, vacrel->relnamespace, + vacrel->relname))); + } + } + else + { + Assert(vacrel->eager_scan_remaining_fails > 0); + vacrel->eager_scan_remaining_fails--; + } + } /* * Now drop the buffer lock and, potentially, update the FSM. @@ -1164,7 +1469,9 @@ lazy_scan_heap(LVRelState *vacrel) * * The block number and visibility status of the next block to process are set * in *blkno and *all_visible_according_to_vm. The return value is false if - * there are no further blocks to process. + * there are no further blocks to process. If the block is being eagerly + * scanned, was_eager_scanned is set so that the caller can count whether or + * not an eagerly scanned page is successfully frozen. * * vacrel is an in/out parameter here. Vacuum options and information about * the relation are read. vacrel->skippedallvis is set if we skip a block @@ -1174,13 +1481,16 @@ lazy_scan_heap(LVRelState *vacrel) */ static bool heap_vac_scan_next_block(LVRelState *vacrel, BlockNumber *blkno, - bool *all_visible_according_to_vm) + bool *all_visible_according_to_vm, + bool *was_eager_scanned) { BlockNumber next_block; /* relies on InvalidBlockNumber + 1 overflowing to 0 on first call */ next_block = vacrel->current_block + 1; + *was_eager_scanned = false; + /* Have we reached the end of the relation? */ if (next_block >= vacrel->rel_pages) { @@ -1253,6 +1563,7 @@ heap_vac_scan_next_block(LVRelState *vacrel, BlockNumber *blkno, *blkno = vacrel->current_block = next_block; *all_visible_according_to_vm = vacrel->next_unskippable_allvis; + *was_eager_scanned = vacrel->next_unskippable_eager_scanned; return true; } } @@ -1276,11 +1587,12 @@ find_next_unskippable_block(LVRelState *vacrel, bool *skipsallvis) BlockNumber rel_pages = vacrel->rel_pages; BlockNumber next_unskippable_block = vacrel->next_unskippable_block + 1; Buffer next_unskippable_vmbuffer = vacrel->next_unskippable_vmbuffer; + bool next_unskippable_eager_scanned = false; bool next_unskippable_allvis; *skipsallvis = false; - for (;;) + for (;; next_unskippable_block++) { uint8 mapbits = visibilitymap_get_status(vacrel->rel, next_unskippable_block, @@ -1288,6 +1600,19 @@ find_next_unskippable_block(LVRelState *vacrel, bool *skipsallvis) next_unskippable_allvis = (mapbits & VISIBILITYMAP_ALL_VISIBLE) != 0; + /* + * At the start of each eager scan region, normal vacuums with eager + * scanning enabled reset the failure counter, allowing vacuum to + * resume eager scanning if it had been suspended in the previous + * region. + */ + if (next_unskippable_block >= vacrel->next_eager_scan_region_start) + { + vacrel->eager_scan_remaining_fails = + vacrel->eager_scan_max_fails_per_region; + vacrel->next_eager_scan_region_start += EAGER_SCAN_REGION_SIZE; + } + /* * A block is unskippable if it is not all visible according to the * visibility map. @@ -1316,28 +1641,41 @@ find_next_unskippable_block(LVRelState *vacrel, bool *skipsallvis) break; /* - * Aggressive VACUUM caller can't skip pages just because they are - * all-visible. They may still skip all-frozen pages, which can't - * contain XIDs < OldestXmin (XIDs that aren't already frozen by now). + * All-frozen pages cannot contain XIDs < OldestXmin (XIDs that aren't + * already frozen by now), so this page can be skipped. */ - if ((mapbits & VISIBILITYMAP_ALL_FROZEN) == 0) - { - if (vacrel->aggressive) - break; + if ((mapbits & VISIBILITYMAP_ALL_FROZEN) != 0) + continue; - /* - * All-visible block is safe to skip in non-aggressive case. But - * remember that the final range contains such a block for later. - */ - *skipsallvis = true; + /* + * Aggressive vacuums cannot skip any all-visible pages that are not + * also all-frozen. + */ + if (vacrel->aggressive) + break; + + /* + * Normal vacuums with eager scanning enabled only skip all-visible + * but not all-frozen pages if they have hit the failure limit for the + * current eager scan region. + */ + if (vacrel->eager_scan_remaining_fails > 0) + { + next_unskippable_eager_scanned = true; + break; } - next_unskippable_block++; + /* + * All-visible blocks are safe to skip in a normal vacuum. But + * remember that the final range contains such a block for later. + */ + *skipsallvis = true; } /* write the local variables back to vacrel */ vacrel->next_unskippable_block = next_unskippable_block; vacrel->next_unskippable_allvis = next_unskippable_allvis; + vacrel->next_unskippable_eager_scanned = next_unskippable_eager_scanned; vacrel->next_unskippable_vmbuffer = next_unskippable_vmbuffer; } @@ -1368,6 +1706,12 @@ find_next_unskippable_block(LVRelState *vacrel, bool *skipsallvis) * lazy_scan_prune (or lazy_scan_noprune). Otherwise returns true, indicating * that lazy_scan_heap is done processing the page, releasing lock on caller's * behalf. + * + * No vm_page_frozen output parameter (like that passed to lazy_scan_prune()) + * is passed here because neither empty nor new pages can be eagerly frozen. + * New pages are never frozen. Empty pages are always set frozen in the VM at + * the same time that they are set all-visible, and we don't eagerly scan + * frozen pages. */ static bool lazy_scan_new_or_empty(LVRelState *vacrel, Buffer buf, BlockNumber blkno, @@ -1507,6 +1851,10 @@ cmpOffsetNumbers(const void *a, const void *b) * * *has_lpdead_items is set to true or false depending on whether, upon return * from this function, any LP_DEAD items are still present on the page. + * + * *vm_page_frozen is set to true if the page is newly set all-frozen in the + * VM. The caller currently only uses this for determining whether an eagerly + * scanned page was successfully set all-frozen. */ static void lazy_scan_prune(LVRelState *vacrel, @@ -1515,7 +1863,8 @@ lazy_scan_prune(LVRelState *vacrel, Page page, Buffer vmbuffer, bool all_visible_according_to_vm, - bool *has_lpdead_items) + bool *has_lpdead_items, + bool *vm_page_frozen) { Relation rel = vacrel->rel; PruneFreezeResult presult; @@ -1667,11 +2016,17 @@ lazy_scan_prune(LVRelState *vacrel, { vacrel->vm_new_visible_pages++; if (presult.all_frozen) + { vacrel->vm_new_visible_frozen_pages++; + *vm_page_frozen = true; + } } else if ((old_vmbits & VISIBILITYMAP_ALL_FROZEN) == 0 && presult.all_frozen) + { vacrel->vm_new_frozen_pages++; + *vm_page_frozen = true; + } } /* @@ -1759,6 +2114,7 @@ lazy_scan_prune(LVRelState *vacrel, { vacrel->vm_new_visible_pages++; vacrel->vm_new_visible_frozen_pages++; + *vm_page_frozen = true; } /* @@ -1766,7 +2122,10 @@ lazy_scan_prune(LVRelState *vacrel, * above, so we don't need to test the value of old_vmbits. */ else + { vacrel->vm_new_frozen_pages++; + *vm_page_frozen = true; + } } } diff --git a/src/backend/commands/vacuum.c b/src/backend/commands/vacuum.c index e6745e6145c..a13a2d7f222 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/vacuum.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/vacuum.c @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ int vacuum_multixact_freeze_min_age; int vacuum_multixact_freeze_table_age; int vacuum_failsafe_age; int vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age; +double vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate; /* * Variables for cost-based vacuum delay. The defaults differ between @@ -405,6 +406,11 @@ ExecVacuum(ParseState *pstate, VacuumStmt *vacstmt, bool isTopLevel) /* user-invoked vacuum uses VACOPT_VERBOSE instead of log_min_duration */ params.log_min_duration = -1; + /* + * Later, in vacuum_rel(), we check if a reloption override was specified. + */ + params.max_eager_freeze_failure_rate = vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate; + /* * Create special memory context for cross-transaction storage. * @@ -2165,6 +2171,15 @@ vacuum_rel(Oid relid, RangeVar *relation, VacuumParams *params, } } + /* + * Check if the vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate table storage + * parameter was specified. This overrides the GUC value. + */ + if (rel->rd_options != NULL && + ((StdRdOptions *) rel->rd_options)->vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate >= 0) + params->max_eager_freeze_failure_rate = + ((StdRdOptions *) rel->rd_options)->vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate; + /* * Set truncate option based on truncate reloption if it wasn't specified * in VACUUM command, or when running in an autovacuum worker diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c b/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c index 0ab921a169b..31eaeb77b98 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c @@ -2826,6 +2826,12 @@ table_recheck_autovac(Oid relid, HTAB *table_toast_map, tab->at_params.is_wraparound = wraparound; tab->at_params.log_min_duration = log_min_duration; tab->at_params.toast_parent = InvalidOid; + + /* + * Later, in vacuum_rel(), we check reloptions for any + * vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate override. + */ + tab->at_params.max_eager_freeze_failure_rate = vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate; tab->at_storage_param_vac_cost_limit = avopts ? avopts->vacuum_cost_limit : 0; tab->at_storage_param_vac_cost_delay = avopts ? diff --git a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c index 71448bb4fdd..41b93827cfb 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c @@ -4024,6 +4024,16 @@ struct config_real ConfigureNamesReal[] = NULL, NULL, NULL }, + { + {"vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate", PGC_USERSET, VACUUM_FREEZING, + gettext_noop("Fraction of pages in a relation vacuum can scan and fail to freeze before disabling eager scanning."), + gettext_noop("A value of 0.0 disables eager scanning and a value of 1.0 will eagerly scan up to 100 percent of the all-visible pages in the relation. If vacuum successfully freezes these pages, the cap is lower than 100 percent, because the goal is to amortize page freezing across multiple vacuums.") + }, + &vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate, + 0.03, 0.0, 1.0, + NULL, NULL, NULL + }, + /* End-of-list marker */ { {NULL, 0, 0, NULL, NULL}, NULL, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, NULL, NULL, NULL diff --git a/src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample b/src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample index 079efa1baa7..48f8b1cedc5 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample +++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample @@ -698,6 +698,7 @@ autovacuum_worker_slots = 16 # autovacuum worker slots to allocate #vacuum_multixact_freeze_table_age = 150000000 #vacuum_multixact_freeze_min_age = 5000000 #vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age = 1600000000 +#vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate = 0.03 # 0 disables eager scanning #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ # CLIENT CONNECTION DEFAULTS diff --git a/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.in.c b/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.in.c index 81cbf10aa28..dc122ed1837 100644 --- a/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.in.c +++ b/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.in.c @@ -1388,10 +1388,12 @@ static const char *const table_storage_parameters[] = { "toast.autovacuum_vacuum_threshold", "toast.log_autovacuum_min_duration", "toast.vacuum_index_cleanup", + "toast.vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate", "toast.vacuum_truncate", "toast_tuple_target", "user_catalog_table", "vacuum_index_cleanup", + "vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate", "vacuum_truncate", NULL }; diff --git a/src/include/commands/vacuum.h b/src/include/commands/vacuum.h index 12d0b61950d..7dad14319a1 100644 --- a/src/include/commands/vacuum.h +++ b/src/include/commands/vacuum.h @@ -231,6 +231,13 @@ typedef struct VacuumParams VacOptValue truncate; /* Truncate empty pages at the end */ Oid toast_parent; /* for privilege checks when recursing */ + /* + * Fraction of pages in a relation that vacuum can eagerly scan and fail + * to freeze. Only applicable for table AMs using visibility maps. Derived + * from GUC or table storage parameter. 0 if disabled. + */ + double max_eager_freeze_failure_rate; + /* * The number of parallel vacuum workers. 0 by default which means choose * based on the number of indexes. -1 indicates parallel vacuum is @@ -297,6 +304,16 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT int vacuum_multixact_freeze_table_age; extern PGDLLIMPORT int vacuum_failsafe_age; extern PGDLLIMPORT int vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age; +/* + * Relevant for vacuums implementing eager scanning. Normal vacuums may + * eagerly scan some all-visible but not all-frozen pages. Since the goal + * is to freeze these pages, an eager scan that fails to set the page + * all-frozen in the VM is considered to have "failed". This is the + * fraction of pages in the relation vacuum may scan and fail to freeze + * before disabling eager scanning. + */ +extern PGDLLIMPORT double vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate; + /* * Maximum value for default_statistics_target and per-column statistics * targets. This is fairly arbitrary, mainly to prevent users from creating diff --git a/src/include/utils/rel.h b/src/include/utils/rel.h index 33d1e4a4e2e..3453fbe1c41 100644 --- a/src/include/utils/rel.h +++ b/src/include/utils/rel.h @@ -343,6 +343,12 @@ typedef struct StdRdOptions int parallel_workers; /* max number of parallel workers */ StdRdOptIndexCleanup vacuum_index_cleanup; /* controls index vacuuming */ bool vacuum_truncate; /* enables vacuum to truncate a relation */ + + /* + * Fraction of pages in a relation that vacuum can eagerly scan and fail + * to freeze. 0 if disabled, -1 if unspecified. + */ + double vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate; } StdRdOptions; #define HEAP_MIN_FILLFACTOR 10 -- 2.34.1
