> The "story" I have in mind is: I need to audit an instance I know > nothing about. I ask the client to adapt the logging parameters for > pgbadger (including this one), collect the logs and generate a report > for the said period to have a broad overview of what is happenning.
Let's see if anyone has a different opinion. As far as the current set of patches, I had some other changes that I missed earlier; indentation to the calls in LogParallelWorkersIfNeeded and comment for the LogParallelWorkersIfNeeded function. I also re-worked the setup of the GUC as it was not setup the same way as other GUCs with an options list. I ended up just making those changes in v8. Besides that, I think this is ready for committer. Regards, Sami
v8-0002-Setup-counters-for-parallel-vacuums.patch
Description: Binary data
v8-0001-Add-a-guc-for-parallel-worker-logging.patch
Description: Binary data
v8-0003-Implements-logging-for-parallel-worker-usage-in-u.patch
Description: Binary data
v8-0004-Implements-logging-for-parallel-worker-usage-in-q.patch
Description: Binary data
