On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 4:24 PM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplage...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 1:22 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Are we planning to commit this refactoring? I think this refactoring
> > makes the overall code of BitmapHeapNext() quite clean and readable.
> > I haven't read all patches but 0001-0006 including 0009 makes this
> > code quite clean and readable. I like the refactoring of merging of
> > the shared iterator and the private iterator also.
>
> Thanks for the feedback, Dilip. I've pushed the patches through 0006.
>
> I've reorganized the remaining patches in attached v26.
>
> 0001 is just the refactoring to push the setup into a helper.
> 0002-0003 are required refactoring of the TBMIterateResult and
> TBMIterator to support the read stream API.
> 0004 implements using the read stream API and removing the old prefetching 
> code.
> 0005 removes the table_scan_bitmap_next_block() callback, as it is not
> really used anymore in BitmapHeapNext() to get the next block.
>
> I could use review feedback on all of them. 0001 should be ready to
> push once I get some review.

Bilal mentioned offlist that 0001 had some indentation issues in one
of the comments. v27 attached.

- Melanie

Attachment: v27-0004-BitmapHeapScan-uses-read-stream-API.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: v27-0003-Separate-TBM-Shared-Private-Iterator-and-TBMIter.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: v27-0002-Hard-code-TBMIterateResult-offsets-array-size.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: v27-0005-Remove-table-AM-callback-scan_bitmap_next_block.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: v27-0001-Move-BitmapTableScan-per-scan-setup-into-a-helpe.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to