> On 24 Jan 2025, at 21:07, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > On 2025-01-22 We 4:25 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>> Anyway, no fix was committed as far as I know. I would suggest it should be >> back-patched as well. > > I'm quite partial to the approach suggested upthread by Andres (a separate > pg_gssapi.h file). If there's agreement on that I'm prepared to go and make > it happen, unless Daniel beats me to it. Backpatching also seems reasonable. Thanks for the reminder, I also agree that Andres' suggestion is the best option. I hacked up a patch but got distracted by the pgcrypto GUC patch for a bit. I'll share what I have once I've done a little testing. -- Daniel Gustafsson
