Hi, > > I think this is closely related to the work Yuya Watari has been doing > > at > > https://postgr.es/m/caj2pmkzzhrhgq5uv0y+stkqx7xvgzenmhl98ubkm-oarvk9...@mail.gmail.com > > Perhaps you could contribute by reviewing that patch series. > > Yeah, I'm referencing this one in my email, but it's a series of > patches that does a major refactoring changing thousands of lines. I'm > not sure when or if it's going to land, do you think applying a quick > fix first would make sense? It makes trivial changes in one function.
It looks like the author keeps the patch set up to date. Although he proposes a complicated refactoring this is better than "quick and dirty fix" as you put it, IMO. So I suggest focusing on this patch set. On top of that somehow I doubt we will find a committer willing to be responsible for merging anything quick and dirty anyway. Did you consider checking if the referenced patchset addresses the issue you described? -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
