On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 12:27 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Part of my thought here is that these functions are not worth their > very own TAP test, with all the overhead that implies of firing up > a new database instance. So I was looking for something we could > fold them into.
By themselves, yeah, probably not. Having a separate place for a TCP-focused suite might decrease the activation energy for testing other network features, though. In any case, Aleksander, I don't mean to sign you up for all that; the `ssl` suite also seems good enough to me if you're interested in pursuing that side of the patch further. Thanks! --Jacob
