Hi po 20. 1. 2025 v 8:56 odesílatel Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> napsal:
> On 2025-Jan-17, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Is this really something we are considering applying, since it has been > > around for years? I am unclear on that and we had better know if we are > > going to continue reviewing this. > > The fact that the patch has been around for years doesn't automatically > mean it's a bad idea. > > I have proposed that we discuss this patch at fosdem developer's meeting > next month, precisely to seek consensus on whether this patch is > something we want or not. My view is that this is a feature that has > been requested by users for years, so IMO we want this or something > similar. > > I wonder if the reason that committers stay away from it is that > reviewing it fully (and thus taking responsibility for it) seems such a > daunting task. I might be wrong, but I think this may be the largest > patch since FTS. > This patch is huge, but I think it is not comparable with parallel processing support or with replication support. It doesn't introduce new processes or new data structures or does important changes in planner, and I think so almost all code is very simple. In early versions of this patch, there was a complex part to ensure validity of content in memory. But it was fully removed and replaced just by comparing with create_lsn. Regards Pavel > -- > Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — > https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ > Tom: There seems to be something broken here. > Teodor: I'm in sackcloth and ashes... Fixed. > > http://postgr.es/m/482d1632.8010...@sigaev.ru >
