Hello, Michael!
> Could you summarize here what you have done to achieve test
> stabilization in your new patch set posted at [1] without using the
> proposal of this thread?
Mostly idea is next:
Let's imagine we have two steps - step_before and step_after which may end
in either order.
Then instead of such step/markers structure:
step_before(step_after)
stepN
stepN+1
step_after
use the next:
step_before
stepN
stepN+1
step_after(step_before)
In the first case, there are two possible results:
1) step_before is finished before step_after - reported as step_before,
step_after
2) step_after is launched before step_before ends - reported as step_after,
step_before
But in the case second variant:
1) step_before is finished before step_after - reported as step_before,
step_after
2) step_after is launched before step_before ends - reported as
step_before, step_after
So, the second option provides the same result regardless of order of
finishing of step_before and step_after, which is the thing I want to
achieve here.
Best regards,
Mikhail.
