On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 01:00:04AM +0800, jian he wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 10:20 PM jian he <jian.universal...@gmail.com> wrote: >> dump and execute the above query generated a warning >> WARNING: missing lock for relation "tenk1_hundred" (OID 18431, >> relkind i) @ TID (15,34) > > This seems to be an existing issue. > For pg_restore_relation_stats, we don't have regress tests for index relation. > I am not sure the WARNING is ok.
This is not OK based on the rules introduced by Noah at aac2c9b4fde8. check_lock_if_inplace_updateable_rel() expects a lock to be taken. Note that elog() are used when reports should never be user-facing, for states that should not be reachable. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
