Re: Sort functions with specialized comparators

[Andrey Borodin]

> On 14 Jan 2025, at 13:58, John Naylor <johncnaylo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> That's not as clear-cut as I thought. To avoid regressions, I've gone
> back to an earlier idea to pass the direction to the comparator, but
> this time keep it simple by using the same comparator for sort and
> unique, similar to v9.

Looks good to me.
Nice stats for some cleaning up 34 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-).


Best regards, Andrey Borodin.