On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 10:15:20AM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote: > I am a bit confused, are you suggesting these two alternatives: > 1- Making pgstat_count_io_op_n() static and continuing to use > pgstat_count_io_op() as it is. > 2- Removing pgstat_count_io_op() and instead using > pgstat_count_io_op_n() everywhere.
Either of these options is OK by me. The current state of things just seems a bit strange because we publish a routine that's used nowhere. If you have plans for it in a different patch, that's also fine. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
