> On 6 Jan 2025, at 15:50, Ilia Evdokimov <ilya.evdoki...@tantorlabs.com> wrote: > > Any suggestions for improvements? The patch looks good to me, just a few nits. 0. Perhaps, we could have a test for edge values of 0 and 1. I do not insist, just an idea to think about. 1. This code seems a little different from your patch. It is trying to avoid engaging PRNG. I'm not sure it's a good idea, but still. Also, it uses "<=", not "<". xact_is_sampled = log_xact_sample_rate != 0 && (log_xact_sample_rate == 1 || pg_prng_double(&pg_global_prng_state) <= log_xact_sample_rate); Thanks! Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
- Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements Ilia Evdokimov
- Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements Ilia Evdokimov
- Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements Ilia Evdokimov
- Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements Andrey M. Borodin
- Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statem... Sami Imseih
- Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_s... Ilia Evdokimov
- Re: Sample rate added to pg_st... Ilia Evdokimov
- Re: Sample rate added to pg_st... Andrey M. Borodin
- Re: Sample rate added to p... Sami Imseih
- Re: Sample rate added to p... Ilia Evdokimov
- Re: Sample rate added to p... Ilia Evdokimov
- Re: Sample rate added to p... Ilia Evdokimov
- Re: Sample rate added to p... Sami Imseih
- Re: Sample rate added to p... Ilia Evdokimov