On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 01:47:19PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 1:30 PM Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 03:19:25PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > My thinking was "ask once, bump the thread once after 2 or 3 weeks just > > in case it got lost in the noise (this is a busy list), and after that > > let the matter rest if there is no answer". > > We don't normally ignore emails, so would not bother with a second > request. > > > And yet the squeaky wheel does seem to get the grease; and I know from > personal > experience that emails will go unresponded two for weeks, which to a > reasonable > submitter to this list, when many responses are indeed the same day, seems > like > an email that got overlooked.
Yes, but we are explaining it was not overlooked, but rather no one knows. The odds of a reply are low, and the odds we just ignored it are even lower. If he does ask a second time for each backpatch, we are likely to be even less motivated to help. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
