On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 10:02:18PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > Do you mean that branches for releases which are EOL are not looked at? > I understand that completely. What I was hoping for here was that > someone who was familiar with the old code might be able to look at my > analysis and either confirm that my conclusion is correct (the behavior > affected by the regression in the first commit was only introduced after > 9.4) or not. > > I did my best to structure my request in such a way that it would only > entail minimal effort to answer, assuming that it was viewed by someone > who had worked on those parts of the code that far back in the past.
Agreed. > As far as the five year support timeframe, that is amazing and much > more robust than many (most?) projects. Especially considering the size > and pace of development here. We do have a small (paid) team that tries > to support a specific subset of packages going back longer than 5 years. > > If my request is not reasonable or somehow inappropriate, then please > consider it withdrawn. I think it is good you are asking --- I just don't know if anyone can help. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
