On 12/26/24 17:00, wenhui qiu wrote: > Hi > > As far as I know, more than 10,000 tables of instances are often > encountered, > So I insist that the maximum can be appropriately increased to 256MB， > Can be more adaptable to many table situations >
If 128MB is insufficient, why would 256MB be OK? A factor of 2x does not make a fundamental difference ... Anyway, the 128MB value is rather arbitrary. I don't mind increasing the limit, or possibly removing it entirely (and accepting anything the system can handle). regards -- Tomas Vondra
