Hi,
Currently, iterating through TIDBitmap contains this code (REL_16_STABLE) :
***
while ((page = pagetable_iterate(tbm->pagetable, &i)) != NULL)
{
idx = page - ptbase->ptentry;
if (page->ischunk)
ptchunks->index[nchunks++] = idx;
else
ptpages->index[npages++] = idx;
}
Assert(npages == tbm->npages);
Assert(nchunks == tbm->nchunks);
***
Two asserts in the end seem to be overdue to me, because if (for
example) nchunks > tbm->nchunks (due to another error),
we have already accessed to invalid memory chunk and overwritten it.
If we want to monitor the correctness of these variables, it might be
better to add a few checks, as in the attached patch.
I'm not sure if the comment in the error message is written correctly,
but first I would like to hear your opinion.
--
Best regards,
Daniil Davydov
From 04e41969ef9ea2c96af218a5519b5efb19baeed5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniil Davidov <davydovdaniil...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 19:32:55 +0700
Subject: [PATCH] Add new checks for tidbitmap scan
---
src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c
index 29a18584410..34a015e5ea7 100644
--- a/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c
+++ b/src/backend/nodes/tidbitmap.c
@@ -827,10 +827,17 @@ tbm_prepare_shared_iterate(TIDBitmap *tbm)
while ((page = pagetable_iterate(tbm->pagetable, &i)) != NULL)
{
idx = page - ptbase->ptentry;
- if (page->ischunk)
+ if (page->ischunk && (nchunks + 1 <= tbm->nchunks))
ptchunks->index[nchunks++] = idx;
- else
+ else if (npages + 1 <= tbm->npages)
ptpages->index[npages++] = idx;
+ else
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_INTERNAL_ERROR),
+ errmsg("invalid chunks/pages num in tidbitmap : %d"
+ " chunks met of %d available, %d pages met "
+ "of %d available", nchunks, tbm->nchunks,
+ npages, tbm->npages)));
}
Assert(npages == tbm->npages);
--
2.43.0
