> > > I like the description "STATISTICS DATA" because it differentiates from >
You have Tomas to thank for that: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/bf724b21-914a-4497-84e3-49944f9776f6%40enterprisedb.com the extended stats definitions. It might be worth differentiating > between "RELATION STATISTICS DATA" and "ATTRIBUTE STATISTICS DATA" but > I'm not sure if there's value in that. > I have no objection to such a change, even if we don't currently have a use for the differentiation, someone in the future might. > > But how did you determine what to use for the .tag and prefix? In the > output, it uses the form: > It was the minimal change needed to meet Tomas's suggestion. > Statistics for Name: ...; Name: ...; Type: STATISTICS DATA; ... > I like this one best, because it clarifies the meaning of STATISTICS DATA.
