On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:53:07AM -0500, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2024-12-17 16:50:45 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> I don't see a huge point in backpatching, FWIW. > > I don't see why we wouldn't want to backpatch? The number of objects here > isn't entirely unrealistic to reach with relations alone, and if you enable > e.g. function execution stats it can reasonably reach higher numbers more > quickly. And use DSA_ALLOC_HUGE in that place feels like a rather low risk > change?
Agreed, this feels low-risk enough to back-patch to at least v15, where statistics were moved to shared memory. But I don't see a strong reason to avoid back-patching it to all supported versions, either. -- nathan
