On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:29:53AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > Here's an experimental patch to try changing that policy. It improves > the connection times on my small computer with your test, but I doubt > I'm seeing the real issue. But in theory, assuming a backlog of > connections and workers to start, I think each server loop should be > able to accept and fork one client backend, and fork up to 100 > (MAX_BGWORKERS_TO_LAUNCH) background workers.
Thanks for the quick response! I'm taking a look at the patch... -- nathan
