Hi, Wenhui! On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 17:32, wenhui qiu <qiuwenhu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi aleksander > Didn't you mark this patch as rejected last time? Do we still need to > continue this path? > > > Thanks > > On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 10:16 PM Evgeny Voropaev <evorop.w...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi hackers! >> >> Upgraded the "Int64 GUC" patch in order to conform to f3f06b13308e3 >> updates. Rebased and tested upon the current master (3f9b9621766). The >> patch is still needed to be up to date as a part of the xid64 solution. >> >> Best regards, >> Evgeny Voropaev, >> TantorLabs, LLC. >> <evo...@gmail.com> >> <evgeny.vorop...@tantorlabs.ru> > > I see Aleksander worked on this patch (with many other hackers) and marked it as rejected. And now Evgeniy, a new developer wants to continue and rebase this patch and also the patches in another 64-xid thread disregarding the fact that the patch is rejected. It's not a crime. It's rejected, true. Regards, Pavel Borisov
