On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 06:57:21PM +0000, Akshat Jaimini wrote: > Quick question, are there any more revisions left to be done on this > patch from the previous feedback?
This patch is still listed in the CF app waiting on author with what looks like Robert and Tom objecting to it, because it makes all callers of CreateAndCopyRelationData() much more expensive in terms of WAL generated when copying these files as the holes of the pages would be included. This would also make the compression of the FPWs more expensive. One potential way to move forward would be to spread the knowledge of page_std when logging a new page higher in the callers, then allow dbcommands.c to be smarter about that? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
