On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 4:03 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > If you don't like the idea of a static memcxt in the one block where > it's needed, I propose to store a new memcxt in PGOutputData, to be used > exclusively for publications, with a well defined lifetime. >
+1. This sounds like a way to proceed at least for HEAD. For back-branches, it is less clear whether changing PGOutputData is a good idea. Can such a change in back branches break any existing non-core code (extensions)? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
