On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 3:56 PM Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > I took what you wrote, and repurposed it to prove my old theory about > GiST index-only scans being broken due to the lack of an appropriate > interlock against concurrent TID recycling. See the attached patch.
I've moved discussion of this GiST bug over to the old 2021 thread where I first raised concerns about the issue: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=jjinl9fch8c1l-guh15f4wftwub2x+_nucngcddc...@mail.gmail.com The GiST bug is actually causally unrelated to the bitmap index scan bug under discussion, despite the high-level similarity. Seems best to keep discussion of GiST on its own thread, for that reason. -- Peter Geoghegan
