On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 5:52 PM David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK, thanks. I likely took your neutrality here in a more positive > light after reading the 4-year-old message at [1]. That probably > wasn't the right thing to do.
Yeah, I think my view has wavered over time. Probably when I wrote that message I had recently seen some cases where the additional detail would have been helpful; but as of this writing the cases I've seen most recently are those where the output is mind-numbingly long already. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
