On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 1:55 PM Jelte Fennema-Nio <postg...@jeltef.nl> wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 at 21:48, Sergey Prokhorenko > <sergeyprokhore...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > gen_uuidv7() is OK > > I'd very much prefer to not have a gen_ or get_ prefix as argued before[1][2]. > > My vote is still for simply uuidv7() and uuidv4() > > > uuid-ossp is outdated, slow and not supported by the author. UUIDv7 is the > > renaissance of UUIDs. So we should not depend on legacy technology names > > agreed >
It seems that we agreed to use 'uuidv7' instead of 'uuid_v7()'. There is discussion whether we should add 'gen_' or 'get_' but let's go back to the previously-agreed function name 'uuidv7()' for now. We can rename it later if we find a better name. I've attached the new version patch that incorporated all comments and renamed the functions. Also I avoided using 'if defined(__darwin__) || defined(_MSC_VER)' twice. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
v39-0001-Add-UUID-version-7-generation-function.patch
Description: Binary data
