> I think it is in pretty good shape. After a read-through, the only thing > that stands > out to me is the difference in configure tests between autoconf and meson. I > think we should consider picking one approach, although I'm not sure I have a > strong preference.
Thanks for the review! We can actually leverage meson's built in option to check for a macro: cc.get_define('__SSE4_2__') != ''. This should keep the logic consistent across configure and meson.
v4-0001-Use-__attribute__-target-sse4.2-for-SSE42-CRC32C.patch
Description: v4-0001-Use-__attribute__-target-sse4.2-for-SSE42-CRC32C.patch
v4-0002-Use-consistent-logic-in-configure-and-meson-to-ge.patch
Description: v4-0002-Use-consistent-logic-in-configure-and-meson-to-ge.patch