On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 at 09:55, Yugo Nagata <nag...@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: > > I'll fixed the patch to add leakproof info to \do+ results, but is it worth > leaving this info in \dAo+ results, too? >
I suppose that might still be useful in some contexts. Looking through the complete list of psql meta-commands, "leakproof" could plausibly be added to the output of each of the following: \dAo+ \dC+ \df+ \do+ > > I notice that this patch spells "leakproof" with a hyphen. IMO > > leakproof should not have a hyphen -- at least, that's how I naturally > > spell it, and I think that's more common, and it matches the SQL > > syntax. > > OK, I'll fix it to use "leakproof" without a hyphen. > > > We haven't been consistent about that in the docs and code comments so > > far though, so I think we should make a decision, and then standardise > > on whatever people decide. > > I am not a native English speaker, but if this is natural spelling in > English, I wonder we can replace all of them to leakproof without a hyphen. > Yes, I think we should do that (in a separate patch). Regards, Dean