On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 1:00 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes: > > It's not immediately to clear to me why this would crash in a non-asserts > > build. palloc issues a 512-byte chunk for sizeof(ResultRelInfo)==368 on > v16, > > so I expect no actual writing past the end of the chunk. > > I'm confused too. The allocation should be big enough. The other > hazard would be failing to initialize the field, but if the extension > uses InitResultRelInfo then that's taken care of. > I should have mentioned in my original post that our limited PGD tests are passing too. But I wasn't sure if the problem may hit us in the field, given the subtleness of the memory corruption. But it's quite comforting to read Noah's analysis about why this could be a non-issue for non-assert builds. Thanks, Pavan