On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 5:01 AM Masahiro Ikeda <ikeda...@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: > I noticed that the bloom filter index forgets to increment the index > scan counter > while reviewing the skip scan patch [1]. It seems this was simply > overlooked in > the implementation. What do you think?
I think that you're right. I'll commit this and backpatch once the release tags for the pending set of point releases are pushed. -- Peter Geoghegan
