On 18 July 2018 at 14:01, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > Thanks for the updated version. This looks safer to me. It is possible > to simplify the code by removing the external RAND_status() call and > check for RAND_status() first in the loop as per the attached.
OK, thanks. Barring any further comments, I'll push and back-patch this to v10 later this week. Regards, Dean
