On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 2:20 PM Joel Jacobson <j...@compiler.org> wrote:
> > 1. Text files containing \. in the middle of the file > % cat /tmp/test.txt > foo > \. > bar > > Or another option to turn off the special meaning of \.? > This does seem like an orthogonal option worth considering. > > Besides, "single" as a format name does not sound right. > > Generally the name for a text format designates a set > > of characteristics meaning that certain combinations of > > characters have specific behaviors. > > Sometimes "plain" is used in the context of text formats > > to indicate that no character is special ("plain" is also the > > default subtype of "text" in MIME types). > > > > "single" as proposed is to be understood as "single-column", > > which is a consequence of the lack of a field delimiter, but > > not an intrinsic characteristic of the format. > > If COPY accepted fixed-length fields, it could be in a > > no-delimiter no-escape mode and still handle multiple > > columns, in opposition to what "single" suggests. > > Good points. I agree "plain" is a better name. > > I'm on board with a new named format that selects the desired defaults instead of requiring the user to know and change them all manually. This seems to me like a "list" format. Implying each row is a list entry. Since we have tables the concept of list would likewise reasonably imply a single column. Since newlines are special, i.e., record delimiters, "plain" thus would remain misleading. It could be used for a case where the entire file is loaded into a new row, single column. David J.